Wai Ting Tsang
“Movie clapper with Sharing Economy text on red background” by focusonmore.com is licensed under CC BY 2.0.
Have you recently hailed a traditional taxi or placed an order by calling a restaurant directly, bypassing the convenience of platforms like Uber or DoorDash? The meteoric rise of these platforms, epitomized by Uber becoming the world’s most valuable startup in 2015, heralded the dominance of the sharing economy. This new economic model, driven by rapid internet expansion and technological innovations, has redefined consumer behaviour and raised pressing questions about data security and user privacy. The transformative rise of the sharing economy, while offering unparalleled convenience and reshaping global consumer behaviours, simultaneously underscores a pressing need for heightened data security and stringent privacy measures to ensure continued trust and growth.
“Uber launch Party” by 5chw4r7z is licensed under CC BY-SA 2.0.
The sharing economy, encompassing sectors from transportation to hospitality and beyond, has seamlessly integrated into our everyday lives. The allure of these platforms is evident: they foster peer-to-peer interactions, often bypassing traditional intermediaries and sometimes even monetary transactions. Predictions suggest that the revenue generated from this market is poised to approach an astonishing 230 billion US dollars by 2025. A manifestation of the global shift towards efficient, localized services, studies have illustrated that platforms function most effectively when sellers and buyers are closer – a fundamental tenet of the sharing economy model. Yet, with the profound integration of these platforms into our daily routines comes a heightened responsibility for user data protection and an increased awareness of the potential pitfalls.
Take Uber as a case study. One of the platform’s unique value propositions compared to conventional taxi services is its ability to offer both drivers and riders unmatched flexibility and cost-efficiency. Notably, half of Uber’s driver cohort supplements their income by driving fewer than ten hours weekly. Nevertheless, the company has not been immune to challenges. In April, a significant security lapse at Uber resulted in the accidental exposure of data about over 77,000 drivers. Alarmingly, this wasn’t an isolated incident. The recurring nature of such breaches has understandably sown seeds of mistrust and apprehension among the platform’s vast user base. This brought us another question: what are the challenges that Uber are facing while dedicated to protecting the privacy of customers and workers? And is there any other platform doing a better job than them?
This essay will use Uber as a case study to compare the challenges and risks they face as a sharing economy platform, alongside the other competing products in the market.
Uber, an international platform operating across various nations, often adapts its policies to conform with the regulations and laws of specific jurisdictions. Upon agreeing with Uber, personal data such as drivers’ and passengers’ names, email addresses, phone numbers, and driver’s license details are gathered and stored on their servers. However, multiple security lapses leading to data breaches have been deemed violations of Australian law, explicitly pointing towards Uber’s inability to uphold the security of individual privacy. While some may perceive Uber as merely a casualty of these breaches, the company’s attempts to conceal the breach exacerbated public indignation. Instead of notifying affected users, Uber opted to pay a $100,000 us dollar ransom to silence the hackers and obliterate the compromised data.
This incident illuminates one of the predominant challenges of the sharing economy. Without rigorous regulatory oversight, there’s no absolute assurance of user data protection on these platforms. It’s a stark reminder for regulators and peer platforms alike: safeguarding users’ confidential information isn’t merely advisable. It’s imperative. Failing in this duty can lead to legal consequences, substantial penalties, and a severe erosion of user trust.
In recent years, discussions surrounding the transparency of data processing by Uber, beyond privacy concerns, have come to the forefront. As of April 2023, a pivotal turn was witnessed in this narrative. A cohort of Uber drivers successfully litigated against the ride-sharing giant, asserting that their rights were infringed upon in several areas, notably when attempting to close their accounts.
After the ruling, Uber was mandated to elucidate how drivers’ data and profiling are integrated and utilized within its operational systems. Additionally, the company must transparently disclose its methodologies concerning automated decision-making, especially in the context of determining work allocations for drivers.
This landmark ruling is symbolic of a broader victory for gig economy workers. The essence of trust is paramount in a sharing economy platform. A transparent two-way exchange of information between stakeholders and individuals serves as a bedrock in nurturing this trust. Unfortunately, Uber’s erstwhile practices did not resonate with this ethos until mandated regulatory intervention.
The silver lining, however, is the consequential transformation in Uber’s approach. The platform now, cannot exploit its workforce by withholding fundamental employment rights. This case also serves as a cautionary tale for other platforms, underscoring the need for transparency in data practices to foster trust and cultivate healthier relationships with their user base.
While Uber remains absent in the Chinese market, its counterpart, Didi Chuxing, has not improved significantly. Didi Chuxing, the predominant transportation platform in China, boasts over 493 million annual active users and processes 41 million daily transactions. However, its reputation suffered a severe setback in July 2021 when the application was delisted from China’s app stores. This action followed an announcement by Chinese internet regulatory authorities investigating Didi for potential national security concerns tied to alleged unauthorized data collection.
“BYD Qin Plus EV in DiDi Chuxing Service” by User3204 is licensed under CC BY-SA 4.0.
The drastic step of removing a widely-used application underscores the gravity of the situation and potential infringements related to personal data handling. Further exacerbating Didi’s challenges were two tragic incidents wherein female passengers were murdered during their rides, with these unfortunate events occurring merely months apart. These incidents spotlighted Didi’s potential shortcomings in ensuring user safety.
The challenges mentioned above highlight the critical importance of platforms revisiting and fortifying their policies and operational protocols. If platforms cannot ensure user safety, a foundational expectation, they risk eroding the trust underpinning their customer relationships.
In conclusion, the ascent of the sharing economy, represented by giants like Uber and Didi Chuxing, encapsulates the modern digital age’s promise and pitfalls. While these platforms revolutionize convenience, accessibility, and global consumer patterns, they face significant challenges, particularly in data security and user trust. The incidents highlighted throughout this essay underscore the urgent need for transparent data practices, robust security measures, and unwavering commitment to user safety. As the sharing economy continues to evolve, it is paramount for platforms to prioritize and reinforce these principles, ensuring that technological advancements and consumer trust move forward hand in hand. Only then can such platforms truly harness the transformative potential of the sharing economy, creating a safer and more connected world for all.
References:
Blystone, D. (2023, April 18). The History of Uber. Investopedia. https://www.investopedia.com/articles/personal-finance/111015/story-uber.asp
Collins, P. (2021, October 20). The sharing economy: Definition, examples and advantages. Selectra. https://climate.selectra.com/en/environment/sharing-economy
Cullen, Z., & Farronato, C. (2020). Outsourcing Tasks Online: Matching Supply and Demand on Peer-to-Peer Internet Platforms. Management Science. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2020.3730
D’Hauwers, R., van der Bank, J., & Montakhabi, M. (2020). Trust, Transparency and Security in the Sharing Economy: What is the Government’s Role? Technology Innovation Management Review, 10(5), 6-18. http://ezproxy.library.usyd.edu.au/login?url=https://www-proquest-com.ezproxy.library.sydney.edu.au/scholarly-journals/trust-transparency-security-sharing-economy-what/docview/2411781325/se-2
Hardcastle, J. L. (2023, April 3). Uber driver info stolen in yet another third-party breach. Www.theregister.com. https://www.theregister.com/2023/04/03/uber_drivers_info_stolen/
Huang, E. (2018, August 27). Another woman was murdered while using Didi’s car-pooling service. Quartz. https://qz.com/1370345/another-didi-hitch-ride-hailing-driver-murdered-a-female-passenger-in-china
Liao, M. S. and R. (2021, July 4). Didi app pulled from app stores in China after suspension order. TechCrunch. https://techcrunch.com/2021/07/04/didi-app-pulled-from-app-stores-after-suspension-order/
Liao, R. (2023, January 16). Didi gets China’s approval to relaunch after 18-month security probe. TechCrunch. https://techcrunch.com/2023/01/16/didi-ride-hailing-china-back/
Lomas, N. (2023, April 5). Drivers in Europe net big data rights win against Uber and Ola. TechCrunch. https://techcrunch.com/2023/04/05/uber-ola-gdpr-worker-data-access-rights-appeal/
Meyer, J. (2016). Uber-positive : Why americans love the sharing economy. Encounter Books.
&legal. (2022, January 4). “Uber” Decision puts teeth into Australian Privacy Laws. & Legal. https://andlegal.com.au/uber-decision-puts-teeth-into-australian-privacy-laws/
Uber paid hackers to keep data breach quiet. (n.d.). Www.youtube.com. Retrieved October 5, 2023, from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RgL8df0IG_c
This work is licensed under CC BY-SA 4.0
